21 Replies to “[ANC SQUARE OFF] Season 6 Elimination Round 1: UST vs DLSU”

  1. Malaking sampal na katotohanan na kahit na nasa Article 2, Sec. 26 na 'yung sagot, still, political dynasties exist. I really hate the third debater of the negative side, but I totally agree that what all he said was very true. 😭

  2. How can Atty Rances be an attorney and Beautiful at the same time? Na saan ang hustisya?

  3. Yung nasa likod ng pangatlong speaker ng affirmative tungo ng tungo halata namang walang naiintidihan.

  4. The judge was right that it was a tight fight. I like how the affirmative side was consistent, firm, and unwavering. The DLSU sure knew how to put a fight and gave substantial alternatives that was delivered exceptionally by the whole group and later emphasized and elaborated further by the best speaker 🙂

  5. political dynasty that it could give a negative effect to our country it could lost our dignity as a countrymen some other people constituents they are willing to run for the respective position of the goverment but they were hesitate to run because they were afraid to run so many reasons first some relatives willing to run because of personal interest there is no political well to govern to they specific conuntry they were were belong anti dynasty law should be a law approved by the congress and the senate

  6. political dynasty that it could give a negative effect to our country it could lost our dignity as a countrymen some other people constituents they are willing to run for the respective position of the goverment but they were hesitate to run because they were afraid to run so many reasons first some relatives willing to run because of personal interest there is no political well to govern to they specific conuntry they were were belong anti dynasty law should be a law approved by the congress and the senate

Comments are closed.