Comments

  1. @thomasmacisaac1503

    f4 is pretty normal for that format, and whatever you lose in DoF because of the aperture, you gain in the size of the format.

  2. @stmsaiya

    The problem, a fixed lens big super bs 🙄 what fujifilm was thinking 🤔🫩💩💩💩💩💩 of a camera

  3. @MaIachiBowen

    I think the camera is cool but with the specs and price I really have to wonder who they made this for

  4. @999.9finegold

    The size calculation is incorrect. The red is full frame, the orange is medium format, and the light blue is mamya rb67

  5. @danielbarbieri8199

    I don't want it even if it's given to me as a gift. I wouldn't be able to afford lenses that measure up. Just like the author of the video…😂😂😂

  6. @carlmcneill1139

    That's a lot of money for a niche camera with a fixed lens. I know you have plenty of resolution to crop in tighter but that's not something I want to do all the time instead of having a zoom lens or be able to swap lenses. If I solely shot street photography and never wanted another focal length then I might would jump on it.

  7. @RetroHoo

    It’s too expensive for what it is. The lens in utterly uninspired the F4 max is funny. There will be a lively second hand market for these things and a lot of disappointed amateurs with empty wallets

  8. @unicornzzzz420

    $5k….. wow. That’s absolutely insane. $2k at most, $1.5k reasonably. But 5 of those Ks..

  9. @DSG0805

    That is a shame about no ibis and f4. One or the other needed to be better for me personally to be interested. You can buy a 100mp gfx body for less

  10. @GuitarVocalHEroes

    It's not. Bulky. Heavy. Horrible AF. Fake sense of retro camera – a lot worse than X100 series carry.

  11. @onapersonalnote7045

    I was skeptical with the lack of IBIS and F4, but after using it for a model shoot at 3200-4000 iso… the files are cleaaaaaaaan.

Comments are closed.